Seven's CNY kongxi

ASPARTAME aka Equal, Nutra sweet, AminoSweet ...

	Aspartame - your sweet death

Aspartame Kills
Aspartame gets a New name

More doctors prefer the AK-Vaccine-47 rifle by Merck

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

(NaturalNews) This parody cartoon grew out of the idea that vaccines are "shots" that are being increasingly forced upon children and teens. At times, these vaccines are enforced at gunpoint or with the presence of vicious guard dogs -- as happened in Maryland two years ago when a court judge ordered thousands of parents to bring their children to court for vaccination or face gunpoint arrest and possible jail time. (http://www.naturalnews.com/022267.html)

Most modern vaccinations are, of course, a form of chemical violence against children. If they were all formulated without chemical preservatives (like thimerosal) and dangerous adjuvants (which can harm the nervous system), that might be a different story. But far too many of today's vaccines are chemical concoctions that are entirely unnatural to the human body. To force them into the bodies of innocent children is an act of medical violence.

The method of introducing the vaccines is unnatural and highly interventionist: These chemicals and DNA / RNA fragments are injected directly into the tissues and blood, bypassing the skin (a normal protective defense) and bypassing the digestive system, too. An injected mandatory vaccine dumps foreign material directly into the bloodstream of children without the consent of either the child or the parents -- that's what qualifies mandatory vaccines as "chemical violence" against children.

The Mad Doctor is in

The doctor in this parody cartoon was intentionally created to depict a "crazed" mad doctor because nothing turns an ordinary doctor into a mad man faster than an argument about vaccines. While he may seem to be a reasonable person on all other subjects, once you challenge him on the dangers of over-vaccination of children, all reason gets thrown out the window and he morphs into a raging lunatic of unscientific emotion.

The complete lack of scientific evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of vaccines makes no difference to him. "Vaccines need no science," he'll say, "Because everybody knows they work!"

My offer of $10,000 to anyone who can produce a scientific study proving the safety and effectiveness of H1N1 vaccines remains utterly unclaimed: http://www.naturalnews.com/027985_H...

Vaccine failures are common

Meanwhile, in the real world vaccines are failing miserably. A recent outbreak of mumps in the New Jersey / New York area occurred almost entirely among children who had already been vaccinated against mumps. I covered this story here: http://www.naturalnews.com/028142_m...

Clearly if vaccines really worked, then an outbreak should have only occurred among those who were NOT vaccinated against mumps, right? But as I reported here on NaturalNews, 77 percent of the children who got infected had already been vaccinated!

A similar truth emerges when you look at H1N1 deaths: Thousands of those who were vaccinated against H1N1 swine flu had already received the vaccine shots (http://www.naturalnews.com/027956_H...). We still don't know the exact number of how many vaccinated people died because the CDC is hiding that data from the public, making sure the mainstream media doesn't learn the truth that even many of those who were vaccinated still died.

Malaysia begins caning women for adultery - Proud to be a 1Malaysian

Does news like this pride me in being a 1Malaysian especially when it appears at my favourite news portal?

Jeff Rense Program

Malaysia begins caning women for adultery

It's being called the largest research fraud in medical history.

Big Pharma researcher admits to faking dozens of research studies for Pfizer, Merck (opinion)

(NaturalNews) It's being called the largest research fraud in medical history. Dr. Scott Reuben, a former member of Pfizer's speakers' bureau, has agreed to plead guilty to faking dozens of research studies that were published in medical journals.

Now being reported across the mainstream media is the fact that Dr. Reuben accepted a $75,000 grant from Pfizer to study Celebrex in 2005. His research, which was published in a medical journal, has since been quoted by hundreds of other doctors and researchers as "proof" that Celebrex helped reduce pain during post-surgical recovery. There's only one problem with all this: No patients were ever enrolled in the study!

Dr. Scott Reuben, it turns out, faked the entire study and got it published anyway.

It wasn't the first study faked by Dr. Reuben: He also faked study data on Bextra and Vioxx drugs, reports the Wall Street Journal.

As a result of Dr. Reuben's faked studies, the peer-reviewed medical journal Anesthesia & Analgesia was forced to retract 10 "scientific" papers authored by Reuben.The Day of London reports that 21 articles written by Dr. Reuben that appear in medical journals have apparently been fabricated, too, and must be retracted.

After being caught fabricating research for Big Pharma, Dr. Reuben has reportedly signed a plea agreement that will require him to return $420,000 that he received from drug companies. He also faces up to a 10-year prison sentence and a $250,000 fine.

He was also fired from his job at the Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass. after an internal audit there found that Dr. Reuben had been faking research data for 13 years. (http://www.theday.com/article/20100...)

Business as usual in Big Pharma

What's notable about this story is not the fact that a medical researcher faked clinical trials for the pharmaceutical industry. It's not the fact that so-called "scientific" medical journals published his fabricated studies. It's not even the fact that the drug companies paid this quack close to half a million dollars while he kept on pumping out fabricated research.

The real story here is that this is business as usual in the pharmaceutical industry.

Dr. Reuben's actions really aren't that extraordinary. Drug companies bribe researchers and doctors as a routine matter. Medical journals routinely publish false, fraudulent studies. FDA panel members regularly rely on falsified research in making their drug approval decisions, and the mainstream media regularly quotes falsified research in reporting the news.

Fraudulent research, in other words, is widespread in modern medicine. The pharmaceutical industry couldn't operate without it, actually. It is falsified research that gives the industry its best marketing claims and strongest FDA approvals. Quacks like Dr Scott Reuben are an important part of the pharmaceutical profit machine because without falsified research, bribery and corruption, the industry would have very little research at all.

Pay special attention to the fact that the Anesthesia & Analgesia medical journal gladly published Dr. Reuben's faked studies even though this journal claims to be a "scientific" medical journal based on peer review. Funny, isn't it, how such a scientific medical journal gladly publishes fraudulent research with data that was simply invented by the study author. Perhaps these medical journals should be moved out of the non-fiction section of university libraries and placed under science fiction.

Remember, too, that all the proponents of pharmaceuticals, vaccines and mammograms ignorantly claim that their conventional medicine is all based on "good science." It's all scientific and trustworthy, they claim, while accusing alternative medicine of being "woo woo" wishful thinking and non-scientific hype. Perhaps they should have a quick look in the mirror and realize it is their own system of quack medicine that's based largely on fraudulent research, bribery and corruption.

Fluoride? You mean that teeth strengthening thing in the toothpaste? How Toxic is Fluoride compared to Lead and Arsenic? - Powered by Google Docs

How Toxic is Fluoride compared to Lead and Arsenic? - Powered by Google Docs: "How Toxic is Fluoride compared to Lead and Arsenic?"

Reunion Dinner, Lunar New Year 2010

more about "Reunion Dinner, Lunar New Year 2010", posted with vodpod

Beware - Aspartame Has Been Renamed 'AminoSweet'

Beware - Aspartame Has Been Renamed 'AminoSweet'

Beware - Aspartame Has Been
Renamed 'AminoSweet'
And is now being marketed as a 'natural' sweetener!

By Ethan Huff
Citizen Journalist
2-13-10

Mumps outbreak spreads among people who got vaccinated against mumps

Thursday, February 11, 2010
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

(NaturalNews) To hear the vaccine pushers say it, all the recent outbreaks of mumps and measles are caused by too few people seeking out vaccinations. It's all those "non-vaccinated people" who are a danger to society, they say, because they can spread disease.

Reality tells a different story, however: It is the vaccinated people who are causing these outbreaks and spreading disease!

Just this week, an outbreak of mumps among more than 1,000 people in New Jersey and New York has raised alarm among infectious disease authorities. The outbreak itself is not unusual, though. What's unusual is that the health authorities slipped up and admitted that most of the people infected with mumps had already been vaccinated against mumps.

In Ocean County, New Jersey, county spokeswoman Leslie Terjesen told CNN that 77 percent of those who caught mumps had already been vaccinated against mumps.

77 of those infected had been vaccinated

Usually this information is censored out of the press. The vaccine industry wants the public to believe that vaccines are effective at preventing infection. So the media typically refrains from reporting what percentage of the infected people were already vaccinated against the infectious disease.

But in this case, the 77 percent figure slipped out. And now intelligent observers are increasingly seeing the truth about these vaccines:

• Infectious disease vaccines simply don't work. If they did, then why did all these children who were already vaccinated still get mumps?

• Vaccines may actually increase your risk of disease. Notice that far more vaccinated children were stricken with mumps than non-vaccinated children?

• The people who administer vaccines never tell you that their vaccines don't really work. They tell you that you'll be "protected" with the vaccine, implying a near-100% level of protection (which is blatantly false).

• Even if you're vaccinated against a disease, you may still catch that disease anyway! So what's the point of the vaccine?

The lies of the CDC

The CDC claims the mumps vaccine is 76 to 95 percent effective, but they offer no scientific evidence whatsoever to support that claim. To date, there has never been a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study published on the mumps vaccine in humans. The so-called "scientific" evidence supporting these vaccines is purely imaginary.

I still have a $10,000 reward offered for anyone who can provide a single scientific study proving the safety and effectiveness of any H1N1 vaccine (http://www.naturalnews.com/027985_H...). To date, not a single person has stepped forward to claim that $10,000. I might as well raise the reward to a million dollars, because I'll never have to pay it: There is no scientific evidence proving the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines!

Does being vaccinated raise your risk of infection?

The CDC also says that 2009 was a bad year for mumps outbreaks. They blame all the people who refuse to be vaccinated for causing these outbreaks. Their theory, of course, is based on the imaginary idea that mumps vaccines halt mumps infections. But once again, it's all imaginary! As we saw this week in New Jersey, most of the people who get infected in these outbreaks are the very people who were vaccinated!

If mumps vaccines actually worked, then what you should see instead is the mumps infection spreading among those who refused the vaccines, right? It's only logical.

In fact, if vaccines really work, then why should the vaccinated people be bothered at all by those who don't get vaccinated? After all, if their vaccines protect themselves from disease, then non-vaccinated people are no threat to them, right? So why are vaccinated people so pushy about forcing non-vaccinated people to get vaccinated?

I recently bought this laptop and "Saya tak rela diliwat lagi"

This is my 5th day using this new laptop. Here's what I think of it.

1. it's fast but the tons of Toshiba utility programs that bogs the startup time - really really dulls the excitement.

At least 14 Toshiba applications are pre-installed and starts running from the time you hit the ON button - from things like security thumbscanner to a HDD monitor that faithfully pops up a message to tell you that it's so clever to have had sensed that you had 'bumped' the laptop and hence parked its HDD head - for safety.

2. if you have sweaty fingers or do not like shiny surfaces that will literally display finger and palm smudges - this is not something you will like. So that's why-la they bundle with this laptop a 5x5inch surface cleaning cloth - ya as if grated you will put in the effort to wipe wipe wipe all the time. I do however think that CSI would love this laptop as evidence in their lab as they will find all kinds of prints on it.

3. It comes with Windows 7 Home Premium but why is the MS SQL Server 2005 hogging it? It's preinstalled but by whom? Toshiba or did it come with Win 7 Home? And what is it for? An ordinary Joe consumer wouldn't appreciate it. No documentation, hardcopy nor did I find anything online that could tell me. Anyone?!

4. Whether you are a techie or not, you will wonder why is this new and modern machine running so 'slow', especially at startup - after all it has the latest Core i5 with Turbo Boost technology and I had even upgraded from the default 2GB of RAM to 4GB (and that's DDR3 speeds for you thank you).

IF you are a techie and you go get something like the Yamicsoft Windows 7 Manager and run all the tweaks therein, then the effort makes the difference. What difference? Well from a the point when you press the ON button till you get to click a desktop icons and get an actual response from your action:

- before 'tweaking' - 4 minutes of coffee-making waiting time on your hands;

- After 'tweaking' - it came down to a decent 15 seconds.

Now somebody tell me what's wrong with that scenario and how would Toshiba like to answer the average Joe-computer-illiterate?

5. The Toshiba telephone customer support SUCKS! (I can find a nicer, better word but I purposely want to spell this word S-U-C-K-S)

The website gives you a list of support centre numbers to call. They will even do a callback if you enter your phone number on their website. Great. But guess what after waiting 5 minutes listening to some music and the AVR messages?

A live person comes on and you end up shouting profanities at him after which you bang down the phone, hard, when a simple query like 'how-to get this utility working' is put to him.

Want to know the response? - here it comes ... 'I recommend you re-image your laptop'.

I Do What? Re-what? Re-image, as in wipe out everything to factory-defaults and start my 5 days of life all over again just because you don't *bloody* bother to advice me on my drivers or perhaps perform some troubleshooting steps over the line with me? Li-wat la.

So I paid RM3499 for this thing and added RM160 for the additional 2GB RAM making my cost RM3659. If I could turn back time and do it again would I want this beast?

'Saya tak rela di liwat lagi'. Funny how the grass does usually seem greener at other side - well at least until you get there and find out someone's asking you to re-image just to get a utility working again.

Sure I've got more to share but for now, this is Toshiba - Leading Innovation for you.

'Routine' MMR vaccination most likely the cause of at least 2 child deaths annually

TWO children a year die after routine vaccinations, research has shown.
In some cases the Government has awarded parents up to £100,000 under its Vaccine Damage Payment Act 1979. In others, post mortem examin ations concluded that the injection was the most likely cause of death.

The figures, compiled by vaccine damage support group Jabs, come in the wake of last month’s decision by the General Medical Council that Dr Andrew Wakefield, who sparked the MMR controversy, acted “dishonestly and irresponsibly”. The research also found that it has become more difficult to get compensation for vaccine damage despite no drop in the number of children being affected.

There were 970 payments made between 1979 and 1994, about 65 a year, to parents of damaged children.

Since then there have been only 28 payments, approximately two successful claims a year. Critics say this is because the criteria for making a claim have become so strict. Peter Fletcher, former chief scientific officer for the Department of Health, is demanding an overhaul of the payment system.

He said: “We need to point out in easy language that vaccines have always had a level of adverse effects.

“However, it is hard to meet the standard of proof to win compensation and awards have been miserly.”

Julie Roberts, 40, whose daughter Stacey died after an MMR jab, said: “The Government should take responsibility. It has never given proper warnings of the risk and still doesn’t despite the evidence.”

By Lucy Johnston

A contribution from my ex-employers Shell Oil

What is it?

Malaysia files suit against Apple’s iPad for copying patents

Malaysia files suit against Apple’s iPad for copying patents

“we have painstakingly worked with lawyers and marketing firms to come up with an idea that was original and convincing, and now Apple has simply come in and stolen it.”

By Jerome Martin