Forward to time index 3:33 to see the actual adrenaline pump.
Monday, June 17, 2013
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Thursday, June 6, 2013
Free??? Gardasil HPV Vaccine NOT Tested for Carcinogens & Causes Cancer!
With Michael Douglas
recent declaration that he "got cancer" by performing oral sex on too many women -- and here's the proof recording of him saying this even though he later denied it
-- actor Michael Douglas joins the long list of Hollywood celebrities
who embarrass themselves by repeating absurd lies told to them by cancer
doctors.
If having oral sex with women gives you cancer, then Charlie Sheen should be the world's most monstrous walking tumor. But he isn't. That's because oral sex doesn't cause cancer. It's a delusional medical myth dreamed up by the vaccine industry to sell HPV vaccines to the masses by linking them to common sex acts.
Malaysian girls will soon start dying...
By Sandy Lunoe | May 13th, 2012
If having oral sex with women gives you cancer, then Charlie Sheen should be the world's most monstrous walking tumor. But he isn't. That's because oral sex doesn't cause cancer. It's a delusional medical myth dreamed up by the vaccine industry to sell HPV vaccines to the masses by linking them to common sex acts.
Malaysian girls will soon start dying...
Free HPV Jabs For College Girls Soon
Tuesday, 28 May 2013 13:23
KUALA LUMPUR: The government will introduce a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for college-going girls to prevent cervical cancer.
Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr S. Subramaniam said the ministry was
discussing the details with the Women, Family and Community Development
Ministry as well as the National Population and Family Development
Board.
"We believe such a life-saving endeavour
must not only be limited to adolescent girls," said Dr Subramaniam,
whose speech was read by the deputy director-general of health Datuk Dr
Maimunah Hamid at the Global Forum on Cervical Cancer Prevention here
yesterday.
He said Malaysia was the first country in Southeast Asia and one of the first in Asia, to implement a National HPV Immunisation Programme.
"We know that these vaccines work best when given to adolescent girls. Free HPV vaccines through a school-based programme were provided to 13-year-olds in government and private schools.
"Until now, more than 95 per cent of eligible girls have received all three doses of the vaccine."
Malaysia began its cervical cancer screening programme more than 40 years ago and over the years, has worked to strengthen it.
He said Malaysia was the first country in Southeast Asia and one of the first in Asia, to implement a National HPV Immunisation Programme.
"We know that these vaccines work best when given to adolescent girls. Free HPV vaccines through a school-based programme were provided to 13-year-olds in government and private schools.
"Until now, more than 95 per cent of eligible girls have received all three doses of the vaccine."
Malaysia began its cervical cancer screening programme more than 40 years ago and over the years, has worked to strengthen it.
- New Straits Times
http://www.nst.com.my/nation/general/free-hpv-jabs-for-college-girls-soon-1.288097
http://www.nst.com.my/nation/general/free-hpv-jabs-for-college-girls-soon-1.288097
I also posted a report on Gardasil last year:
By Sandy Lunoe | May 13th, 2012
When we see the term “cancer vaccine” in connection with the HPV (human papilloma virus) vaccine Gardasil we may naturally assume that it prevents cervical cancer, yet there is no evidence whatsoever that this is the case. (1) On the contrary, the term is incorrect because unbelievable though it may sound Gardasil may actually cause cancer. This fact is being ignored by Merck the manufacturer and other promoters including doctors and health authorities.
NOT TESTED FOR CARCINOGENICITY
Information in the package insert states that the vaccine has not been tested for carcinogenicity. (2) Why has this not been done? Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence! There appears to be no official requirement for vaccines to be tested for carcinogenicity and no incentive for manufacturers to do so. Many experts consider that vaccines are conducive towards the dramatic worldwide increase in cancer cases.
REPLACEMENT MAY CAUSE DEVELOPMENT OF CANCER
A normal phenomenon in virology is that virus strains which have been removed are replaced by new ones. It is not known by anyone, including the vaccine manufacturer whether the new virus strains are more carcinogenic than the original ones which have been removed.
The chief editor of the Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association, immunologist Charlotte Haug writes about several unanswered questions including that of replacement in her article “We Need to Talk about HPV Vaccination – Seriously”:
Abhorred vacuum.There is another serious question that may be answered sooner: what effect will the vaccine have on the other cancer-causing strains of HPV? Nature never leaves a void, so if HPV-16 and HPV-18 are suppressed by an effective vaccine, other strains of the virus will take their place. The question is, will these strains cause cervical cancer?
Results from clinical trials are not encouraging. Vaccinated women show an increased number of precancerous lesions caused by strains of HPV other than HPV-16 and HPV-18. The results are not statistically significant, but if the trend is real – and further clinical trials should tell us in a few years – there is reason for serious concern. (3)
In an article in the New England Journal of Medicine “ Human Papilloma Virus Vaccination – Reasons for Caution”, Dr. Haug again poses the question of replacement:
“How will the vaccine affect other oncogenic strains of HPV? If HPV-16 and HPV-18 are effectively suppressed, will there be selective pressure on the remaining strains of HPV? Other strains may emerge as significant oncogenic serotypes”. (4)
Replacement was obviously one of several unanswered questions when FDA, Merck and the Norwegian government signed a contract which involved research studies on thousands of young Norwegian schoolgirls. The agreement was that Gardasil would be approved in US under the condition that extensive research projects were carried out in Norway. There was implication of corruption in connection with introduction of Gardasil in the childrens’ vaccination program. (5)
The contract includes this statement from FDA to Merck:
“You have committed to conduct a study in collaboration with the Norwegian Government, if GARDASIL is approved in the European Union and the Government of Norway incorporates HPV vaccination into its national guidelines, to assess the impact of HPV vaccination on the following in Norway … to assess whether administration of GARDASIL will result in replacement of these diseases due to vaccine HPV types with diseases due to non-vaccine HPV types.” (6)
ABNORMAL PAP SMEARS AFTER GARDASIL VACCINATION
It is worrying to note that many cases of abnormal Pap smears, cervical dysplasia and cervical cancer are registered after Gardasil vaccination. Reports from VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System regarding HPV vaccines are regularly published by SaneVax.(7) The numbers registered with VAERS may be as low as one percent of the actual cases.
INCREASE IN CERVICAL CANCER RISK FOR THOSE PREVIOUSLY EXPOSED TO THE HUMAN PAPILLOMA VIRUS
One of the most disturbing observations which deserves serious investigation concerns the considerable potential increase in risk of cancer after Gardasil vaccination for those who have been pre- exposed to the human papilloma virus.
Sanevax writes:
Sanevax writes:
Peer-reviewed analysis and studies many of them on the FDA, NCI and CDC web sites point out the dangers of many of the vaccine ingredients including the potential for the HPV vaccines to increase the risk for pre-cancerous lesions if adolescents have been previously exposed to the human papillomavirus and then get vaccinated: 44.6% increase post Gardasil.
Judicial Watch writes in their Special Report “Examining The FDA’s HPV Vaccine Records”:
A chart in the committee’s report revealed that efficacy in subjects already exposed to “relevant HPV types” had an observed efficacy rate of -44.6%. The disturbing efficacy rate raises questions as to who should be receiving the vaccine, and why the FDA allows Gardasil to be administered without prescreening for HPV. The outcomes that can result from pre-exposure are disconcerting and deserve far more attention.(8)
Saturday, June 1, 2013
Sucralose is made from sugar, but once processed its chemical make up is very different. Gram for gram it is 600 times sweeter than table sugar.
Splenda can modify how the body handles sugar and could lead to diabetes, according to a new study.
Scientists found that consuming the sugar alternative made of sucralose caused a person's sugar levels to peak at a higher level and in turn increase the amount of insulin a person produced.
Researchers said that while they did not fully understand the implications of the findings, they might suggest that Splenda could raise the risk of diabetes.
This is because regularly elevated insulin levels can lead to insulin resistance, which is a known path to type 2 diabetes.
'Our results indicate that this artificial sweetener is not inert - it does have an effect,' said Yanina Pepino, research assistant professor of medicine at the Washington School of Medicine in St. Louis, who led the study.
'And we need to do more studies to determine whether this observation means long-term use could be harmful.'
Sucralose is made from sugar, but once processed its chemical make up is very different. Gram for gram it is 600 times sweeter than table sugar.
The scientists analysed the effects of Splenda in 17 severely obese people who did not have diabetes and did not use artificial sweeteners regularly.
Participants had an average body mass index of just over 42. A person is considered obese when their BMI reaches 30.
Scientists gave subjects either water or dissolved sucralose to drink before they consumed glucose (sugar).
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2333336/Could-artificial-sweetener-CAUSE-diabetes-Splenda-modifies-way-body-handles-sugar-increasing-insulin-production-20.html#ixzz2Uxe0l9Q7
Scientists found that consuming the sugar alternative made of sucralose caused a person's sugar levels to peak at a higher level and in turn increase the amount of insulin a person produced.
Researchers said that while they did not fully understand the implications of the findings, they might suggest that Splenda could raise the risk of diabetes.
This is because regularly elevated insulin levels can lead to insulin resistance, which is a known path to type 2 diabetes.
'Our results indicate that this artificial sweetener is not inert - it does have an effect,' said Yanina Pepino, research assistant professor of medicine at the Washington School of Medicine in St. Louis, who led the study.
'And we need to do more studies to determine whether this observation means long-term use could be harmful.'
Sucralose is made from sugar, but once processed its chemical make up is very different. Gram for gram it is 600 times sweeter than table sugar.
The scientists analysed the effects of Splenda in 17 severely obese people who did not have diabetes and did not use artificial sweeteners regularly.
Participants had an average body mass index of just over 42. A person is considered obese when their BMI reaches 30.
Scientists gave subjects either water or dissolved sucralose to drink before they consumed glucose (sugar).
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2333336/Could-artificial-sweetener-CAUSE-diabetes-Splenda-modifies-way-body-handles-sugar-increasing-insulin-production-20.html#ixzz2Uxe0l9Q7
.jpg)
Monday, May 20, 2013
The Incredible Healing Effect of Mother's Touch
The human body is not just a dynamic sophisticated biochemical and
genetic system; there are strong energetic, emotional and psychological
aspects that interact decisively with the physical counterparts of the
body and can make a very measurable difference in our physiological
functions.
A valid proof of this comes from the neonatal Kangaroo care method (K method), which requires skin to skin contact between the mother and the newborn baby. While this simple intervention provides superior support for preterm, low-weight babies, in comparison to conventional practices, such as the use of incubator, it is rarely included in official hospital policies or recommended to mothers by mainstream experts.
Pediatricians have expressed fears that keeping a preterm baby outside of an incubator during the Kangaroo interaction, may expose the infant to cold with subsequent loss of body heat and lower body temperatures, which can be critical to the survival and wellbeing of weak babies. Research however shows that the exact opposite is happening during the K care method. A study involving low-weight preterm babies (less than 1.5 Kg) and their mothers, published in the Journal of Pediatrics, found that the body temperature of the newborn actually rises when the infant is skin to skin in touch with the mother's chest.
Perhaps the most remarkable story that was brought to the public's attention is the miraculous revival of premature baby boy Jamie Ogg, who, following his birth was pronounced dead by doctors after 20 minutes of resuscitation efforts. His mother put him on her chest and held him for 2 hours, when he suddenly started to gasp for air and was soon breathing normally.
Full Story here
A valid proof of this comes from the neonatal Kangaroo care method (K method), which requires skin to skin contact between the mother and the newborn baby. While this simple intervention provides superior support for preterm, low-weight babies, in comparison to conventional practices, such as the use of incubator, it is rarely included in official hospital policies or recommended to mothers by mainstream experts.
Pediatricians have expressed fears that keeping a preterm baby outside of an incubator during the Kangaroo interaction, may expose the infant to cold with subsequent loss of body heat and lower body temperatures, which can be critical to the survival and wellbeing of weak babies. Research however shows that the exact opposite is happening during the K care method. A study involving low-weight preterm babies (less than 1.5 Kg) and their mothers, published in the Journal of Pediatrics, found that the body temperature of the newborn actually rises when the infant is skin to skin in touch with the mother's chest.
Perhaps the most remarkable story that was brought to the public's attention is the miraculous revival of premature baby boy Jamie Ogg, who, following his birth was pronounced dead by doctors after 20 minutes of resuscitation efforts. His mother put him on her chest and held him for 2 hours, when he suddenly started to gasp for air and was soon breathing normally.
Full Story here
Posted on:
Saturday, May 18th 2013 at 5:00 am
Written By:
Eleni RoumeliotouSunday, May 19, 2013
Inventor of ADHD: “ADHD is a fictitious disease”
by Moritz Nestor
Fortunately, the Swiss National Advisory Commission
on Biomedical Ethics (NEK, President: Otfried Höffe) critically
commented on the use of the ADHD drug Ritalin in its opinion of 22
November 2011 titled Human enhancement by means of pharmacological
agents1: The consumption of pharmacological agents altered the child’s behavior without any contribution on his or her part.
That amounted to interference in the child’s freedom
and personal rights, because pharmacological agents induced behavioral
changes but failed to educate the child on how to achieve these
behavioral changes independently. The child was thus deprived of an
essential learning experience to act autonomously and emphatically which
“considerably curtails children’s freedom and impairs their personality
development”, the NEK criticized.
The alarmed critics of the Ritalin disaster are now
getting support from an entirely different side. The German weekly Der
Spiegel quoted in its cover story on 2 February 2012 the US American
psychiatrist Leon Eisenberg, born in 1922 as the son of Russian Jewish
immigrants, who was the “scientific father of ADHD” and who said at the
age of 87, seven months before his death in his last interview:
“ADHD is a prime example of a fictitious disease”2
Since 1968, however, some 40 years, Leon Eisenberg’s
“disease” haunted the diagnostic and statistical manuals, first as
“hyperkinetic reaction of childhood”, now called “ADHD”. The use of ADHD
medications in Germany rose in only eighteen years from 34 kg (in 1993)
to a record of no less than 1760 kg (in 2011) – which is a 51-fold
increase in sales! In the United States every tenth boy among ten
year-olds already swallows an ADHD medication on a daily basis.
With an
increasing tendency.3
When it comes to the proven repertoire of Edward
Bernays, the father of propaganda, to sell the First World War to his
people with the help of his uncle’s psychoanalysis and to distort
science and the faith in science to increase profits of the industry –
what about investigating on whose behalf the “scientific father of ADHD”
conducted science? His career was remarkably steep, and his “fictitious
disease” led to the best sales increases. And after all, he served in
the “Committee for DSM V and ICD XII, American Psychiatric Association”4
from 2006 to 2009. After all, Leon Eisenberg received “the Ruane Prize
for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Research.
He has been a leader in
child psychiatry for more than 40 years through his work in
pharmacological trials, research, teaching, and social policy and for
his theories of autism and social medicine”.5
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)